2, respectively, in overall strokes gained. His long game was the main reason he was a tournament-best 12 under par on the par-5s at Bay Hill.įor the year, Broadie has Tiger and Rory McIlroy ranked No. Woods gained 0.5 strokes on long tee shots (ranking 30th out of 118) and was great on other long shots as well (for example, gaining 0.7 strokes on shots in 200-250 yards from the hole and an additional 0.8 strokes on shots 150-200 yards from the hole). "His 3.0 strokes-gained long game was ranked 1 in the field." "Tiger couldn't have won just with his long game, but it's the part of his game that separated him from the field," Broadie said. Tiger's putting gain of 1.4 putts per round breaks down to 0.1 gained in 0 to 6 feet, 0.7 in 7 to 21 feet and 0.6 in putts 22 feet and longer. Graeme McDowell, who finished second, gained 3.2 strokes per round on the field. This breaks down into a gain of 3.0 from the long game (shots longer than 100 yards to the hole), 0.1 from the short game (shots fewer than 100 yards from the hole, excluding putts) and 1.4 from putting. The biggest chunk of those strokes gained during that period came from his long game (2.08), with his short game (0.42) and his putting (0.70) accounting for the rest.Īt Bay Hill, Tiger was 4.5 strokes per round better than the field, according to Broadie's research. Broadie used PGA Tour ShotLink data from 2003 to 2010 to determine that Tiger gained 3.2 strokes per round over the average tour player. Over the years, Broadie has looked very closely at the strokes-gained performance of Tiger Woods. Strokes gained gives you a much better measure of a quality of a shot." "But they don't take into if you miss a fairway or a green by 1 yard or 20 yards. "Most of the past PGA Tour stats are pretty simple in that they involve counting how many putts you take or how many fairways you hit," Broadie said in January. His putts-gained stat, which takes into account the distance each putt starts from the hole and then compares the number of putts taken to the average of other PGA Tour golfers from that distance, is widely considered to be the most accurate measure of putting in the game.īroadie believes that his strokes-gained approach is a more accurate way of measuring performance than most of the tour's stat categories. The method uses data to make it easier to pinpoint a golfer's strengths and weaknesses by measuring the quality of shots in units relative to the field. Mark Broadie, a professor at Columbia University's business school, is a pioneer of the strokes-gained approach to PGA Tour statistics.
Tiger woods pga tour 2003 putting stat not working upgrade#
You have reached a degraded version of because you're using an unsupported version of Internet Explorer.įor a complete experience, please upgrade or use a supported browser